Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh CX4
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-PM2 versus Ricoh CX4, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and CX4 (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PM2 was released 2 years after the CX4 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-PM2 scores versus the CX4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Ricoh CX4
| E-PM2 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2013 | August 2010 | Newer by 34 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus E-PM2
| CX4 | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Ricoh CX4
| E-PM2 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera often, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM2 has got exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM2 versus Ricoh CX4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PM2 against the CX4.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and CX4 is 89 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by viewing specifications. The picture here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and CX4.
Plainly, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PM2 will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-PM2 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-PM2 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-05-21 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $448 | $211 |