Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44feb/44feb07953aefdecd1c932b892c37c909755f51a" alt="Olympus PEN E-PM2 front Olympus PEN E-PM2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88a11/88a11bb02e0ad8b3bdbbf0916f24e031f73d8b87" alt="Samsung NX210 front Samsung NX210 front"
90 Imaging
62 Features
57 Overall
60
Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Introduced August 2012
- Replaced the Samsung NX200
- Renewed by Samsung NX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the NX210 (20MP) is pretty close but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and NX210 (APS-C) come with different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PM2 was manufactured 10 months later than the NX210 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-PM2 grades vs the NX210 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Samsung NX210. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Samsung NX210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Samsung NX210
E-PM2 | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2013 | ![]() | August 2012 | Fresher by 10 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX210 over the Olympus E-PM2
NX210 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Samsung NX210
E-PM2 | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 provides outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX210 has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-PM2 versus the NX210.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09105/091059c1fe5285a62e4fb45983e253ad1b80b66d" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and NX210 is 89 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2c36/d2c36a088ef45bcac6720d6c4886100592bd821a" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The photograph below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and NX210.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX210 will render more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger E-PM2 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59b58/59b5842bf28462b562e640e77c9c4e8b83ad7435" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8b9b/c8b9b90adb842db341e78fb3a2a8b8937f3296e8" alt="Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PM2 vs Samsung NX210 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Samsung NX210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Samsung NX210 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-05-21 | 2012-08-14 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 222g (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | 71 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | 719 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 330 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $448 | $625 |