Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma DP2x
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
86 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma DP2x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 41mm (F) lens
- 280g - 113 x 60 x 56mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Succeeded the Sigma DP2s
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma DP2x Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-PM2 and Sigma DP2x, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and DP2x (5MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and DP2x (APS-C) provide different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-PM2 was introduced 2 years later than the DP2x and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP2x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-PM2 scores versus the DP2x in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma DP2x Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Sigma DP2x. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Sigma DP2x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sigma DP2x
E-PM2 | DP2x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | February 2011 | Fresher by 28 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2x over the Olympus E-PM2
DP2x | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sigma DP2x
E-PM2 | DP2x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma DP2x Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 provides outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Sigma DP2x has specifications of 113mm x 60mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") with a weight of 280 grams (0.62 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PM2 and Sigma DP2x in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PM2 vs the DP2x.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and DP2x is 89 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma DP2x Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The visual below will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and DP2x.
Plainly, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus E-PM2 will give you extra detail using its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern E-PM2 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma DP2x Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma DP2x Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sigma DP2x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sigma DP2x |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 41mm (1x) |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Forced Flash, Red-Eye Reduction, Slow Synchro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 lbs) | 280g (0.62 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 60 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $448 | $699 |