Clicky

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma Quattro H

Portability
89
Imaging
52
Features
63
Overall
56
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro H front
Portability
78
Imaging
72
Features
59
Overall
66

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs

Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Released May 2013
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
Sigma Quattro H
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - APS-H Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Released February 2016
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma Quattro H, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and Quattro H (APS-H) come with different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-PM2 was launched 3 years earlier than the Quattro H which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-PM2 grades versus the Quattro H with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sigma Quattro H

 E-PM2 Quattro H 
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Olympus E-PM2

 Quattro H E-PM2 
ReleasedFebruary 2016May 2013Newer by 33 months
Display resolution1620k460kCrisper display (+1160k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sigma Quattro H

 E-PM2 Quattro H 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison

If you are going to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM2 has outside dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma Quattro H in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PM2 vs the Quattro H.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma Quattro H size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and Quattro H is 89 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma Quattro H top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison

Typically, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by checking technical specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PM2 and Quattro H.

As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma Quattro H will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 29MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged E-PM2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma Quattro H sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Portrait photography factors
Sigma Quattro H Portrait photography factors
71
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
83
manual focus
sensor resolution is great (45 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-H)
comes with face detection focus
exports RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-PM2
Street photography with Sigma Quattro H
79
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
comes with touch to focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
70
sensor size is good (APS-H)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Sports photography factors
Sigma Quattro H Sports photography factors
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect AF
71
sensor resolution is great (45MP)
sensor size is good (APS-H)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proofing
comes with phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.8 fps)
does not have image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Travel photography factors
Sigma Quattro H Travel photography factors
66
comes with touch to focus
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not have selfie friendly display
65
weather proofing
sensor resolution is great (45MP)
lack of Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-PM2
Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro H
74
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
lack of Time Lapse recording
75
manual focus
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
sensor resolution is great (45 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-H)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
does not have image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma Quattro H as a Vlogging camera
36
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not have selfie friendly display
lack of external mic port
26
comes with face detection focus
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution ( pixels)
lack of external mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM2 and Sigma Quattro H
 Olympus PEN E-PM2Sigma sd Quattro H
General Information
Make Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus PEN E-PM2 Sigma sd Quattro H
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2013-05-21 2016-02-23
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-H
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 26.6 x 17.9mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 476.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 45 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 6200 x 4152
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sigma SA
Amount of lenses 107 76
Crop factor 2.1 1.4
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames/s 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 -
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 269g (0.59 pounds) -
Dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 932 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 images -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-5 BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $448 $1,134