Clicky

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A300

Portability
89
Imaging
52
Features
63
Overall
56
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Launched May 2013
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Revealed January 2008
  • Newer Model is Sony A330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A300 Overview

Let's look closer at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A300, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and A300 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-PM2 was manufactured 5 years after the A300 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-PM2 grades against the A300 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sony A300

 E-PM2 A300 
RevealedMay 2013January 2008Newer by 65 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus E-PM2

 A300 E-PM2 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sony A300

 E-PM2 A300 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

If you're going to travel with your camera, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PM2 features external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Sony A300 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PM2 versus the A300.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A300 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and A300 is 89 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through specs. The image underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and A300.

All in all, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 because of its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus E-PM2 will resolve extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-PM2 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-PM2
Portrait photography with Sony A300
71
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
59
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
low MP (10MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-PM2
Street photography with Sony A300
79
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
provides focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
74
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Sports photography information
Sony A300 Sports photography information
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect AF
54
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect AF
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
low MP (10 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Travel photography details
Sony A300 Travel photography details
66
provides focus by touch
good resolution (16MP)
does not have Time Lapse function
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
45
flash built-in
no Time Lapse mode
low MP (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Landscape photography details
Sony A300 Landscape photography details
74
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
does not have Time Lapse function
57
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
low MP (10MP)
no Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Vlogging information
Sony A300 Vlogging information
36
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have external mic jack
9
no video shooting
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM2 and Sony A300
 Olympus PEN E-PM2Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus PEN E-PM2 Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2013-05-21 2008-01-30
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 107 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 8.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 269 gr (0.59 lbs) 632 gr (1.39 lbs)
Dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 72 64
DXO Color Depth score 22.7 22.5
DXO Dynamic range score 12.2 11.4
DXO Low light score 932 538
Other
Battery life 360 photos -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $448 $0