Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony NEX-F3
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Released August 2012
- Earlier Model is Sony NEX-C3
- Updated by Sony NEX-3N
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony NEX-F3, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is relatively close but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and NEX-F3 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-PM2 was launched 10 months later than the NEX-F3 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-PM2 scores vs the NEX-F3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sony NEX-F3
| E-PM2 | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2013 |  | August 2012 | More recent by 10 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus E-PM2
| NEX-F3 | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sony NEX-F3
| E-PM2 | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM2 features outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-F3 has dimensions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony NEX-F3 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PM2 and the NEX-F3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and NEX-F3 is 89 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PM2 and NEX-F3.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same megapixel count albeit different sensor measurements. The E-PM2 offers the smaller sensor which is going to make getting shallower DOF harder. The newer E-PM2 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2012-08-16 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Total lenses | 107 | 121 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269g (0.59 lbs) | 314g (0.69 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 72 | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | 932 | 1114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photos | 470 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $448 | $470 |