Clicky

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1

Portability
89
Imaging
53
Features
63
Overall
57
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
 
Sony Alpha QX1 front
Portability
90
Imaging
63
Features
48
Overall
57

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs

Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Revealed May 2013
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
Sony QX1
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • " Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
  • Introduced September 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Overview

Following is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Lens-style by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the QX1 (20MP) is fairly similar but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and QX1 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The E-PM2 was announced 15 months before the QX1 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.

Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-PM2 matches up against the QX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sony QX1

 E-PM2 QX1 
Display sizing3""Larger display (+3")
Display resolution460k0kClearer display (+460k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus E-PM2

 QX1 E-PM2 
IntroducedSeptember 2014May 2013More modern by 15 months

Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sony QX1

 E-PM2 QX1 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM2 has got physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has dimensions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-PM2 and the QX1.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and QX1 is 89 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading specifications. The picture underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and QX1.

Plainly, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony QX1 will deliver greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-PM2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-PM2
Portrait photography with Sony QX1
71
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
exports RAW files
66
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
no manual control
external flash not possible
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Street photography information
Sony QX1 Street photography information
79
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
has touch to focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
screen is fixed
69
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
has touch to focus
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competitors in class (216g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Sports photography details
Sony QX1 Sports photography details
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect auto focus
56
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
good battery power (440 per charge)
max fps low (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Travel photography factors
Sony QX1 Travel photography factors
66
has touch to focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly display
71
good battery power (440 CIPA)
has touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than competitors in class (216 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony QX1 as a Landscape photography camera
74
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
64
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
good battery power (440 CIPA)
tiny screen ( inch)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Vlogging details
Sony QX1 Vlogging details
36
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic port
32
screen is touchscreen
comes with face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
does not have mic port
heavier than competitors in class (216 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM2 and Sony QX1
 Olympus PEN E-PM2Sony Alpha QX1
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus PEN E-PM2 Sony Alpha QX1
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Lens-style
Revealed 2013-05-21 2014-09-03
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Lens-style
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 25600 16000
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 35 25
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.6
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches -
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 0 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames per second 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) 4.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 269 gr (0.59 lbs) 216 gr (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 932 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 pictures 440 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $448 $500