Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
90 Imaging
63 Features
48 Overall
57
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2014
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Lens-style by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the QX1 (20MP) is fairly similar but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and QX1 (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-PM2 was announced 15 months before the QX1 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-PM2 matches up against the QX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Sony Alpha QX1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sony QX1
E-PM2 | QX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 0k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus E-PM2
QX1 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2014 | May 2013 | More modern by 15 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sony QX1
E-PM2 | QX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM2 has got physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has dimensions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-PM2 and the QX1.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and QX1 is 89 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading specifications. The picture underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and QX1.
Plainly, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony QX1 will deliver greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-PM2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Lens-style |
Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2014-09-03 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 357.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5456 x 3632 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.6 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | - |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) | 216 gr (0.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | 440 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $448 | $500 |