Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony HX1
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Revealed April 2009
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony HX1 Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Olympus E-PM2 versus Sony HX1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and HX1 (9MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and HX1 (1/2.4") come with different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PM2 was brought out 4 years after the HX1 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-PM2 scores versus the HX1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PM2 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery and Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sony HX1
E-PM2 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | April 2009 | Newer by 50 months | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Olympus E-PM2
HX1 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sony HX1
E-PM2 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM2 has got exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Sony HX1 has proportions of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PM2 versus Sony HX1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PM2 versus the HX1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and HX1 is 89 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specs. The image here may give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and HX1.
All in all, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will resolve greater detail having its extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger E-PM2 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2009-04-22 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 9.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1440x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lb) | 544 gr (1.20 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $448 | $47,999 |