Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W290
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56
94 Imaging
34 Features
28 Overall
31
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 167g - 98 x 57 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W290 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W290, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and W290 (12MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and W290 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PM2 was revealed 4 years after the W290 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W290 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-PM2 scores versus the W290 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W290 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Sony W290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sony W290
| E-PM2 | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2013 | February 2009 | Newer by 52 months | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W290 over the Olympus E-PM2
| W290 | E-PM2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sony W290
| E-PM2 | W290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W290 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 comes with physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Sony W290 has measurements of 98mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W290 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-PM2 and the W290.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and W290 is 89 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W290 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking technical specs. The pic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and W290.
As you have seen, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will give you extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-PM2 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W290 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W290 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W290 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269g (0.59 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 98 x 57 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $448 | $230 |