Clicky

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W320

Portability
89
Imaging
52
Features
63
Overall
56
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Launched May 2013
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PM1
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W320 Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W320, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is relatively close but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and W320 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-PM2 was revealed 3 years after the W320 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-PM2 grades against the W320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sony W320

 E-PM2 W320 
AnnouncedMay 2013January 2010More modern by 41 months
Focus manually Very precise focus
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus E-PM2

 W320 E-PM2 

Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sony W320

 E-PM2 W320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM2 has got physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Sony W320 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-PM2 versus the W320.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-PM2 and W320 is 89 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by researching technical specs. The picture below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and W320.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PM2 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-PM2 provides an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Portrait photography factors
Sony W320 Portrait photography factors
71
manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
28
good resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-PM2
Street photography with Sony W320
79
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
includes focus via touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
screen is fixed
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W320 as a Sports photography camera
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect autofocus
26
good resolution (14 megapixels)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Travel photography information
Sony W320 Travel photography information
66
includes focus via touch
resolution is good (16MP)
missing Timelapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
66
good resolution (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-PM2
Landscape photography with Sony W320
74
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
missing Timelapse recording
33
relatively wide (26mm)
good resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Vlogging details
Sony W320 Vlogging details
36
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detection autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external microphone socket
26
relatively wide (26mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.7)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM2 and Sony W320
 Olympus PEN E-PM2Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus PEN E-PM2 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Launched 2013-05-21 2010-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 35 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.7-5.7
Macro focusing distance - 4cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 8.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 269 grams (0.59 pounds) 117 grams (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 72 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 22.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 932 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-5 NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $448 $269