Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1
89 Imaging
52 Features
63 Overall
56


96 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 149g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2009

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-PM2 versus Sony WX1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and WX1 (10MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and WX1 (1/2.4") use different sensor size.

The E-PM2 was launched 3 years later than the WX1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-PM2 scores vs the WX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Sony WX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sony WX1
E-PM2 | WX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | ![]() | August 2009 | Fresher by 47 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX1 over the Olympus E-PM2
WX1 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sony WX1
E-PM2 | WX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 comes with outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Sony WX1 has measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PM2 versus Sony WX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-PM2 against the WX1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and WX1 is 89 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The visual here should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and WX1.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will give you more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern E-PM2 should have a benefit in sensor technology.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 160 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.4-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 149 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $448 | $149 |