Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1
89 Imaging
53 Features
63 Overall
57
96 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.9) lens
- 149g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Revealed August 2009
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-PM2 versus Sony WX1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and WX1 (10MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and WX1 (1/2.4") use different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-PM2 was launched 3 years later than the WX1 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-PM2 scores vs the WX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Sony WX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sony WX1
E-PM2 | WX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2013 | August 2009 | Fresher by 47 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX1 over the Olympus E-PM2
WX1 | E-PM2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sony WX1
E-PM2 | WX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PM2 comes with outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Sony WX1 has measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PM2 versus Sony WX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the E-PM2 against the WX1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and WX1 is 89 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The visual here should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and WX1.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PM2 will give you more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern E-PM2 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony WX1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-05-21 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 160 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.4-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 149 grams (0.33 lbs) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 932 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $448 | $149 |