Clicky

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A35

Portability
89
Imaging
52
Features
63
Overall
56
Olympus PEN E-PM2 front
 
Sony SLT-A35 front
Portability
69
Imaging
56
Features
70
Overall
61

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A35 Key Specs

Olympus E-PM2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
  • Introduced May 2013
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PM1
Sony A35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 415g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Replaced the Sony A33
  • Later Model is Sony A37
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A35 Overview

In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A35, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-PM2 (16MP) and the A35 (16MP) is relatively similar but the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and A35 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-PM2 was revealed 21 months after the A35 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-PM2 scores versus the A35 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Sony A35

 E-PM2 A35 
RevealedMay 2013September 2011Newer by 21 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus E-PM2

 A35 E-PM2 
Screen resolution921k460kClearer screen (+461k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Sony A35

 E-PM2 A35 
Manual focus More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PM2 provides outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Sony A35 has dimensions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-PM2 compared to the A35.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A35 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PM2 and A35 is 89 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading technical specs. The image underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PM2 and A35.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-PM2 offers the tinier sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier. The more recent E-PM2 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Portrait photography highlights
Sony A35 Portrait photography highlights
71
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
saves RAW formats
73
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports face detect focus
saves RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Street photography highlights
Sony A35 Street photography highlights
79
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
includes focus by touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
71
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lighter than competitors in class (415g)
good ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Sports photography factors
Sony A35 Sports photography factors
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
61
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (6.0 fps)
bad battery (440 per charge)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Travel photography info
Sony A35 Travel photography info
66
includes focus by touch
good MP (16 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
58
lighter than competitors in class (415 grams)
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery (440 CIPA)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Landscape photography features
Sony A35 Landscape photography features
74
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
missing Time Lapse recording
69
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
bad battery (440 shots)
missing Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PM2 Vlogging features
Sony A35 Vlogging features
36
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
missing external mic port
36
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has mic jack
lighter than competitors in class (415 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-PM2 vs Sony A35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PM2 and Sony A35
 Olympus PEN E-PM2Sony SLT-A35
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus PEN E-PM2 Sony SLT-A35
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2013-05-21 2011-09-20
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 35 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 107 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 460k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames per second 6.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) 12.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 269g (0.59 lb) 415g (0.91 lb)
Dimensions 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 72 74
DXO Color Depth score 22.7 23.3
DXO Dynamic range score 12.2 12.7
DXO Low light score 932 763
Other
Battery life 360 photos 440 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-5 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $448 $598