Olympus E-PM2 vs Zeiss ZX1
89 Imaging
51 Features
63 Overall
55
67 Imaging
76 Features
62 Overall
70
Olympus E-PM2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Revealed May 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PM1
(Full Review)
- 37MP - Full frame Sensor
- 4.34" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 51200
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 35mm (F2-22) lens
- 800g - 142 x 93 x 46mm
- Revealed September 2018
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus E-PM2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PM2 and Zeiss ZX1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Zeiss. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-PM2 (16MP) and ZX1 (37MP) and the E-PM2 (Four Thirds) and ZX1 (Full frame) offer different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PM2 was released 6 years prior to the ZX1 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Zeiss ZX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-PM2 matches up vs the ZX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-PM2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PM2 & Zeiss ZX1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PM2 Gallery & Zeiss ZX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Zeiss ZX1
| E-PM2 | ZX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Zeiss ZX1 over the Olympus E-PM2
| ZX1 | E-PM2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2018 | May 2013 | Fresher by 65 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 4.34" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.34") | |
| Screen resolution | 2765k | 460k | Crisper screen (+2305k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PM2 and Zeiss ZX1
| E-PM2 | ZX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-PM2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PM2 features external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Zeiss ZX1 has proportions of 142mm x 93mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PM2 and Zeiss ZX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-PM2 and the ZX1.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PM2 and ZX1 is 89 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PM2 and ZX1.
Clearly, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PM2 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Zeiss ZX1 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 21MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-PM2 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PM2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-PM2 vs Zeiss ZX1 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Zeiss ZX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Zeiss |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | Zeiss ZX1 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-05-21 | 2018-09-27 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 36 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 864.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 37 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 7488 x 4992 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 255 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 35mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2-22 |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 4.34" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 2,765 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 6,221 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 269g (0.59 lbs) | 800g (1.76 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 142 x 93 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.7" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 932 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | 512GB internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $448 | - |