Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus SP-565UZ
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2016
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and SP-565UZ (10MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe PEN-F was released 7 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the PEN-F matches up versus the SP-565UZ in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN-F and Olympus SP-565UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus PEN-F Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Olympus SP-565UZ
PEN-F | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2016 | January 2009 | More recent by 86 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus PEN-F
SP-565UZ | PEN-F |
---|
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus SP-565UZ
PEN-F | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing |
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus PEN-F comes with exterior dimensions of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-565UZ has proportions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus SP-565UZ in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the PEN-F vs the SP-565UZ.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the PEN-F and SP-565UZ is 84 and 72 respectively.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The photograph below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the PEN-F and SP-565UZ.
All in all, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The PEN-F featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus PEN-F will render extra detail as a result of its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The newer PEN-F provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN-F | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-01-27 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 427g (0.94 lb) | 413g (0.91 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 74 | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | 894 | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $1,000 | $400 |