Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus Tough-3000
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Released January 2016
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 3000
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus Tough-3000, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe PEN-F was launched 6 years after the Tough-3000 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the PEN-F grades vs the Tough-3000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN-F & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus PEN-F Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Olympus Tough-3000
PEN-F | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2016 | January 2010 | Newer by 74 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus PEN-F
Tough-3000 | PEN-F |
---|
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus Tough-3000
PEN-F | Tough-3000 |
---|
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus PEN-F has got outer measurements of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") with a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has sizing of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the PEN-F compared to the Tough-3000.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the PEN-F and Tough-3000 is 84 and 94 respectively.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by looking at technical specs. The image below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the PEN-F and Tough-3000.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The PEN-F because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus PEN-F will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent PEN-F will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN-F | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Alternative name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2016-01-27 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 427 grams (0.94 lbs) | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 894 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $1,000 | $0 |