Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2016
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2012
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") offer different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe PEN-F was revealed 3 years later than the TG-1 iHS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the PEN-F matches up vs the TG-1 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN-F & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus PEN-F Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
PEN-F | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2016 | May 2012 | Fresher by 46 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 610k | Crisper screen (+427k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus PEN-F
TG-1 iHS | PEN-F |
---|
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus TG-1 iHS
PEN-F | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size |
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus PEN-F has outside measurements of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") along with a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has proportions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the PEN-F vs the TG-1 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the PEN-F and TG-1 iHS is 84 and 91 respectively.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by reviewing technical specs. The photograph here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the PEN-F and TG-1 iHS.
As you can tell, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The PEN-F using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus PEN-F will deliver more detail because of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer PEN-F should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN-F | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2016-01-27 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 427 grams (0.94 lb) | 230 grams (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 894 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 350 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $1,000 | $399 |