Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Launched January 2016
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe PEN-F was launched 2 years after the TG-2 iHS which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the PEN-F scores vs the TG-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN-F & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus PEN-F Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
PEN-F | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | June 2013 | Newer by 32 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 610k | Sharper display (+427k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus PEN-F
TG-2 iHS | PEN-F |
---|
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus TG-2 iHS
PEN-F | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus PEN-F offers physical dimensions of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") and a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has specifications of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus TG-2 iHS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the PEN-F and the TG-2 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the PEN-F and TG-2 iHS is 84 and 91 respectively.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The image below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the PEN-F and TG-2 iHS.
To sum up, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The PEN-F featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus PEN-F will give greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics much more aggressively. The younger PEN-F provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN-F | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2016-01-27 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 427 grams (0.94 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 894 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 350 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $1,000 | $380 |