Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39f4a/39f4a2ac2cd0fd15df5e1339b544117913bf8f2e" alt="Olympus PEN-F front Olympus PEN-F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Released January 2016
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus PEN-F versus Olympus VR-320, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The PEN-F was unveiled 4 years after the VR-320 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the PEN-F scores versus the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN-F and Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus PEN-F Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Olympus VR-320
PEN-F | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 56 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus PEN-F
VR-320 | PEN-F |
---|
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Olympus VR-320
PEN-F | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus PEN-F offers exterior measurements of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") and a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check the Olympus PEN-F versus Olympus VR-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the PEN-F versus the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e91be/e91be8c6aae150d85b7edc4e4bd1b402f4f6b287" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PEN-F and VR-320 is 84 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65a29/65a29b2a000b6c288ed530e59f57eb7a0355e9ea" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by checking out technical specs. The pic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the PEN-F and VR-320.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The PEN-F having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus PEN-F will provide more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern PEN-F provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e915/1e915f0190e599a171781facde82044d17fcebb7" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b536/6b536fdf009094133ae665a42a8c3f759d365c81" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN-F | Olympus VR-320 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2016-01-27 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 427 grams (0.94 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 894 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,000 | $179 |