Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39f4a/39f4a2ac2cd0fd15df5e1339b544117913bf8f2e" alt="Olympus PEN-F front Olympus PEN-F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c52d/6c52d7dd2676ecdee028e398e53be8633f3f109e" alt="Pentax Q10 front Pentax Q10 front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
56 Overall
44
Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Launched January 2016
(Full Review)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and Q10 (12MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and Q10 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The PEN-F was revealed 3 years after the Q10 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise view of how the PEN-F grades vs the Q10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN-F and Pentax Q10. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus PEN-F Gallery and Pentax Q10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Pentax Q10
PEN-F | Q10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | ![]() | September 2012 | Newer by 42 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q10 over the Olympus PEN-F
Q10 | PEN-F |
---|
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Pentax Q10
PEN-F | Q10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus PEN-F comes with outer dimensions of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Pentax Q10 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Check out the Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the PEN-F versus the Q10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d03/71d03953e2c9647ea5667a7d7b556beabcfed326" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 size comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the PEN-F and Q10 is 84 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ec30/1ec30f7860a7a30f7321541ada35152c3b85ca50" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 top view buttons comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specs. The image here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the PEN-F and Q10.
All in all, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The PEN-F using its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus PEN-F will give greater detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern PEN-F will have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e20f1/e20f1a94d036450d3a0441be05cca839a66f9253" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 sensor size comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0c85/e0c8553c120df0bfb926c47f5b8926f15a158b3b" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Pentax Q10 Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Pentax Q10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus PEN-F | Pentax Q10 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2016-01-27 | 2012-09-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
Total lenses | 107 | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Trailing-curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 427g (0.94 lb) | 200g (0.44 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 74 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 21.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | 10.9 |
DXO Low light rating | 894 | 183 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 270 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $1,000 | $350 |