Clicky

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
84
Imaging
59
Features
79
Overall
67
Olympus PEN-F front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus PEN-F
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
  • Announced January 2016
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Announced November 2009
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Here is a complete comparison of the Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) boast different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The PEN-F was announced 6 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the PEN-F scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 PEN-F GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
AnnouncedJanuary 2016November 2009Fresher by 76 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k920kCrisper screen (+117k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus PEN-F

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro PEN-F 

Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 PEN-F GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen size

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus PEN-F provides physical dimensions of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Compare the Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the PEN-F compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PEN-F and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 84 and 77 respectively.

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by going over specifications. The visual below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the PEN-F and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Plainly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The PEN-F using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus PEN-F will offer you greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent PEN-F should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus PEN-F
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
75
you can focus manually
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
55
manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no liveview feature
MP count low (12 megapixels)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus PEN-F
Street photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
84
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
comes with focus via touch
great high ISO (25,600)
62
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus PEN-F as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Sports photography camera
67
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
bad battery power (330 shots)
lack of phase detect autofocus
32
sensor size is good (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
no liveview feature
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (320 CIPA)
no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus PEN-F Travel photography factors
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography factors
75
comes with focus via touch
good resolution (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
bad battery power (330 CIPA)
49
flash built-in
not so great battery pack (320 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus PEN-F Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography advice
76
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
bad battery power (330 per charge)
46
manual focus
nice screen size (3")
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
not so great battery pack (320 CIPA)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus PEN-F Vlogging info
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Vlogging info
78
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
no microphone support
20
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
does not have selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus PEN-F and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus PEN-FRicoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus PEN-F Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Class Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2016-01-27 2009-11-10
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 2848
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 200
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO 80 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 50mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/2.5
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 180s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/3200s
Max quiet shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shutter speed 10.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash options Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 427 gr (0.94 pounds) 453 gr (1.00 pounds)
Physical dimensions 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 74 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 894 not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photos 320 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $1,000 $566