Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Announced January 2016
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Announced November 2009
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the PEN-F (20MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe PEN-F was announced 6 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the PEN-F scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN-F and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus PEN-F Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
PEN-F | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | November 2009 | Fresher by 76 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 920k | Crisper screen (+117k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus PEN-F
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | PEN-F |
---|
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
PEN-F | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size |
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus PEN-F provides physical dimensions of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the PEN-F compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the PEN-F and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 84 and 77 respectively.
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by going over specifications. The visual below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the PEN-F and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Plainly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The PEN-F using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus PEN-F will offer you greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent PEN-F should have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus PEN-F vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN-F | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-01-27 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/3200s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 427 gr (0.94 pounds) | 453 gr (1.00 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 894 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 320 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $1,000 | $566 |