Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300
84 Imaging
59 Features
79 Overall
67
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39f4a/39f4a2ac2cd0fd15df5e1339b544117913bf8f2e" alt="Olympus PEN-F front Olympus PEN-F front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49a60/49a601b81dc9ac950ac3b4b1df8dd7ab514aa7ad" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front"
63 Imaging
44 Features
51 Overall
46
Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Revealed January 2016
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Previous Model is Sony HX200V
- Renewed by Sony HX400V
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus PEN-F and Sony HX300, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the PEN-F (20MP) and the HX300 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the PEN-F (Four Thirds) and HX300 (1/2.3") feature different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The PEN-F was released 2 years after the HX300 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus PEN-F being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the PEN-F matches up vs the HX300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN-F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The complete galleries are available at Olympus PEN-F Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus PEN-F over the Sony HX300
PEN-F | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2016 | ![]() | February 2013 | Newer by 36 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper screen (+116k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus PEN-F
HX300 | PEN-F |
---|
Common features in the Olympus PEN-F and Sony HX300
PEN-F | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus PEN-F offers exterior measurements of 125mm x 72mm x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") having a weight of 427 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has dimensions of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus PEN-F and Sony HX300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the PEN-F compared to the HX300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5955/c5955695cd78be6b4611764196af6b5090f61d5f" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 size comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the PEN-F and HX300 is 84 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1890/f189042ae75602f951b25e7f9d2f946a7bd43ad9" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The image here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the PEN-F and HX300.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit different sensor dimensions. The PEN-F features the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult. The more modern PEN-F should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3b27/d3b271300b80d36c13870ccb46492cd78ba6bed3" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2e43/f2e438dd61c76e168fb0cf590c9829c0f1327361" alt="Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus PEN-F vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Olympus PEN-F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus PEN-F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2016-01-27 | 2013-02-20 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 427 grams (0.94 lbs) | 623 grams (1.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 74 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 894 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $1,000 | $339 |