Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 6000
88 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
94 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 6000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 6000 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 6000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and 6000 (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SH-50 was revealed 3 years after the 6000 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SH-50 scores vs the 6000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 6000 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SH-50 and Olympus Stylus Tough 6000. The full galleries are available at Olympus SH-50 Gallery and Olympus 6000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus 6000
| SH-50 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 43 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus SH-50
| 6000 | SH-50 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Olympus 6000
| SH-50 | 6000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-50 provides exterior measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus 6000 has sizing of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 6000 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the SH-50 against the 6000.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-50 and 6000 is 88 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The image below might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-50 and 6000.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus SH-50 to deliver more detail because of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more recent SH-50 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications
| Olympus SH-50 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SH-50 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 |
| Also called | - | mju Tough 6000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2013-01-08 | 2009-07-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 50 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1/4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 12.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lb) | 179 grams (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $300 | $259 |