Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus VG-110
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
Photography Glossary Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus SH-50 versus Olympus VG-110, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Ultracompact and both are sold by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and VG-110 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SH-50 was launched 24 months after the VG-110 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the SH-50 scores vs the VG-110 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SH-50 & Olympus VG-110. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-50 Gallery & Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus VG-110
| SH-50 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | February 2011 | More modern by 24 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus SH-50
| VG-110 | SH-50 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Olympus VG-110
| SH-50 | VG-110 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus SH-50 has outer measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-110 has specifications of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SH-50 versus Olympus VG-110 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the SH-50 and the VG-110.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-50 and VG-110 is 88 and 97 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing specifications. The pic underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-50 and VG-110.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus SH-50 to show greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent SH-50 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
| Olympus SH-50 | Olympus VG-110 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SH-50 | Olympus VG-110 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.9-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 gr (0.59 pounds) | 105 gr (0.23 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 170 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-10A | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $300 | $150 |