Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
88 Imaging
34 Features
51 Overall
40
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
Photography Glossary Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus SH-50 versus Olympus XZ-1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the SH-50 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") have different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SH-50 was brought out 24 months later than the XZ-1 making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SH-50 scores against the XZ-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SH-50 & Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SH-50 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus XZ-1
| SH-50 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus SH-50
| XZ-1 | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 614k | 460k | Clearer display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Olympus XZ-1
| SH-50 | XZ-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-50 has got outside measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SH-50 versus Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the SH-50 compared to the XZ-1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-50 and XZ-1 is 88 and 88 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-50 and XZ-1.
To sum up, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SH-50 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus SH-50 will resolve more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer SH-50 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
| Olympus SH-50 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SH-50 | Olympus XZ-1 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-01-08 | 2011-01-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic V |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lb) | 275 gr (0.61 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 34 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-10A | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $567 |