Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88d49/88d491f346db87b2f72053243d7a55b3e85bdf50" alt="Olympus SH-50 front Olympus SH-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus SH-50 versus Olympus XZ-1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the SH-50 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") have different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The SH-50 was brought out 24 months later than the XZ-1 making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the SH-50 scores against the XZ-1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SH-50 & Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SH-50 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus XZ-1
SH-50 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus SH-50
XZ-1 | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Olympus XZ-1
SH-50 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-50 has got outside measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SH-50 versus Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the SH-50 compared to the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e2f3/2e2f312826b5c7f21a02616c1e3f25399b27ef22" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the SH-50 and XZ-1 is 88 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff6de/ff6dee7b2bda3948efd3cf5dc4467ce26fc9454b" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The photograph underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-50 and XZ-1.
To sum up, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SH-50 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus SH-50 will resolve more detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer SH-50 provides a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97b00/97b00797257424bf02ef63e545bf839594dbf812" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ea86/0ea86fd96e351443b9a2eb05edda9b185459714b" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus SH-50 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SH-50 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-01-08 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic V |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lb) | 275 gr (0.61 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-10A | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $300 | $567 |