Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88d49/88d491f346db87b2f72053243d7a55b3e85bdf50" alt="Olympus SH-50 front Olympus SH-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus SH-50 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the SH-50 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The SH-50 was manufactured within a month of the XZ-2 iHS which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SH-50 matches up against the XZ-2 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SH-50 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-50 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SH-50 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus SH-50
XZ-2 iHS | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
SH-50 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | December 2012 | Same age |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-50 has outer measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SH-50 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the SH-50 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8cf1/f8cf199a35fae062a0cefe48f8256f0b1f8b107b" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SH-50 and XZ-2 iHS is 88 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dd7e/5dd7ed7d475af2c9c23bd21830aaee572f0ef444" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The image underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-50 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The SH-50 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus SH-50 will provide you with more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58f74/58f748c85668aeba95f1e66a20358154471b967f" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/197fa/197fa0b14139e8718d4440c40c57de515997622a" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus SH-50 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SH-50 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 12.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) | 346 grams (0.76 pounds) |
Dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-10A | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $300 | $450 |