Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ35
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ38
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus SH-50 and Panasonic FZ35, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and FZ35 (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SH-50 was released 2 years later than the FZ35 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the SH-50 grades against the FZ35 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SH-50 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-50 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Panasonic FZ35
| SH-50 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus SH-50
| FZ35 | SH-50 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Panasonic FZ35
| SH-50 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus SH-50 has got outside dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ35 has specifications of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") having a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SH-50 and Panasonic FZ35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the SH-50 vs the FZ35.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-50 and FZ35 is 88 and 72 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The visual here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-50 and FZ35.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus SH-50 to give more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger SH-50 will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SH-50 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
| Olympus SH-50 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus SH-50 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-08 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 12.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 8.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lb) | 397 gr (0.88 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $300 | $999 |