Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88d49/88d491f346db87b2f72053243d7a55b3e85bdf50" alt="Olympus SH-50 front Olympus SH-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94ff5/94ff5a51162be558964f8f43fe832dff1cbdccd0" alt="Pentax K200D front Pentax K200D front"
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Launched September 2008
- Replaced the Pentax K100D S
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus SH-50 versus Pentax K200D, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and K200D (10MP) and the SH-50 (1/2.3") and K200D (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The SH-50 was brought out 4 years later than the K200D and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the SH-50 matches up vs the K200D in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SH-50 and Pentax K200D. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus SH-50 Gallery and Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Pentax K200D
SH-50 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | September 2008 | More recent by 53 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus SH-50
K200D | SH-50 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Pentax K200D
SH-50 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus SH-50 comes with external measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Pentax K200D has specifications of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SH-50 versus Pentax K200D in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the SH-50 versus the K200D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55d92/55d92554504a920b29d74fc391bbc611055452ed" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D size comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-50 and K200D is 88 and 61 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ed22/5ed22ba9613ce208d0221614b0392d97017a62a2" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at specifications. The photograph here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-50 and K200D.
Plainly, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SH-50 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus SH-50 will resolve greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent SH-50 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdbd1/fdbd1cf45f31a54d9f22aed4528f7abfad9bf85e" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d876/2d876dce95d19808d0fe23fbfdb0183660b401cc" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus SH-50 | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus SH-50 | Pentax K200D |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2008-09-01 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 12.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 690 grams (1.52 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery model | SLB-10A | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $300 | $600 |