Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88d49/88d491f346db87b2f72053243d7a55b3e85bdf50" alt="Olympus SH-50 front Olympus SH-50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd627/dd6277e99ef9f564cea30d5ecbfa8cecd5214610" alt="Pentax Q-S1 front Pentax Q-S1 front"
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Launched August 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the SH-50 (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SH-50 was released 19 months before the Q-S1 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a short view of how the SH-50 matches up vs the Q-S1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SH-50 & Pentax Q-S1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SH-50 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Pentax Q-S1
SH-50 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus SH-50
Q-S1 | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 19 months |
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Pentax Q-S1
SH-50 | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-50 offers physical dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has proportions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the SH-50 versus the Q-S1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17ff5/17ff5a292f69a25ac248cddaf7a9f1835642cbeb" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-50 and Q-S1 is 88 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe63a/fe63acf11220349d3b85672eabe1727c9b51925f" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-50 and Q-S1.
Clearly, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The SH-50 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus SH-50 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The older SH-50 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bd06/4bd06a525ba84803ef00029f92e6f8f078a51ad1" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24ee7/24ee75cd3884fcdd0046348d0a863d7a3aee52a9" alt="Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SH-50 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Olympus SH-50 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus SH-50 | Pentax Q-S1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2014-08-04 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VI | Q Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 203g (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-10A | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $300 | $250 |