Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX3
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Released June 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus SH-50 versus Ricoh CX3, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SH-50 was launched 2 years after the CX3 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SH-50 scores vs the CX3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh CX3. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SH-50 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Ricoh CX3
| SH-50 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 32 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus SH-50
| CX3 | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh CX3
| SH-50 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-50 provides outside measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-50 versus Ricoh CX3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SH-50 and the CX3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-50 and CX3 is 88 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The image below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-50 and CX3.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-50 to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The younger SH-50 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Olympus SH-50 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus SH-50 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | SLB-10A | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $300 | $329 |