Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX5
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX5 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX5, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and CX5 (10MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-50 was manufactured 18 months after the CX5 which makes them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a brief summation of how the SH-50 matches up versus the CX5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SH-50 & Ricoh CX5. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-50 Gallery & Ricoh CX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Ricoh CX5
| SH-50 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | July 2011 | More modern by 18 months | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX5 over the Olympus SH-50
| CX5 | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh CX5
| SH-50 | CX5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-50 comes with physical dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX5 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the SH-50 compared to the CX5.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-50 and CX5 is 88 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-50 and CX5.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus SH-50 to offer you extra detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher SH-50 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh CX5 Specifications
| Olympus SH-50 | Ricoh CX5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SH-50 | Ricoh CX5 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 12.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) | 205 grams (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $300 | $399 |