Clicky

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
88
Imaging
39
Features
48
Overall
42
Olympus SH-50 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus SH-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

Below, we are looking at the Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the SH-50 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SH-50 was announced 3 years later than the GR Digital III and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SH-50 scores against the GR Digital III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 SH-50 GR Digital III 
IntroducedJanuary 2013July 2009More recent by 43 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus SH-50

 GR Digital III SH-50 
Display resolution920k460kClearer display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 SH-50 GR Digital III 
Manual focus More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-50 comes with physical dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the SH-50 compared to the GR Digital III.

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-50 and GR Digital III is 88 and 92 respectively.

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specs. The graphic below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-50 and GR Digital III.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SH-50 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus SH-50 will show more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger SH-50 will have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SH-50 Portrait photography features
Ricoh GR Digital III Portrait photography features
43
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
39
you can focus manually
exports RAW files
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus SH-50
Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital III
64
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with touch to focus
lighter than competition (269 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
55
exports RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus SH-50 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography highlights
48
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
16
can't change focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus SH-50 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography highlights
69
lighter than competition (269g)
comes with touch to focus
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
63
flash built-in
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SH-50 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography advice
49
focusing manually
relatively wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good megapixels (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
44
you can focus manually
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3")
exports RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SH-50 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging factors
34
relatively wide (25mm)
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (269 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have mic support
25
good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus SH-50Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus SH-50 Ricoh GR Digital III
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2013-01-08 2009-07-27
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VI GR engine III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Lowest native ISO 125 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-600mm (24.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.0-6.9 f/1.9
Macro focus distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 seconds 1 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 12.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.00 m 3.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 269g (0.59 lbs) 208g (0.46 lbs)
Dimensions 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model SLB-10A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $300 $399