Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Refreshed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and GR Digital III (10MP) and the SH-50 (1/2.3") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SH-50 was announced 3 years later than the GR Digital III and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick summation of how the SH-50 scores against the GR Digital III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SH-50 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-50 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
| SH-50 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | July 2009 | More recent by 43 months | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus SH-50
| GR Digital III | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh GR Digital III
| SH-50 | GR Digital III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-50 comes with physical dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR Digital III has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the SH-50 compared to the GR Digital III.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-50 and GR Digital III is 88 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specs. The graphic below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH-50 and GR Digital III.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The SH-50 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus SH-50 will show more detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The younger SH-50 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
| Olympus SH-50 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SH-50 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2009-07-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269g (0.59 lbs) | 208g (0.46 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $300 | $399 |