Clicky

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-30

Portability
88
Imaging
39
Features
48
Overall
42
Olympus SH-50 front
 
Ricoh WG-30 front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs

Olympus SH-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
  • Launched January 2013
Ricoh WG-30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Launched October 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview

In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-30, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the SH-50 (16MP) and the WG-30 (16MP) is fairly similar and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The SH-50 was unveiled 21 months before the WG-30 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the SH-50 matches up against the WG-30 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Ricoh WG-30

 SH-50 WG-30 
Manual focus More precise focus
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kCrisper display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus SH-50

 WG-30 SH-50 
LaunchedOctober 2014January 2013More recent by 21 months

Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh WG-30

 SH-50 WG-30 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-50 provides external measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-30 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the SH-50 vs the WG-30.

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-30 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-50 and WG-30 is 88 and 91 respectively.

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-30 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison

Generally, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements only by reviewing technical specs. The visual below will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-50 and WG-30.

As you have seen, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect similar quality of pictures although you would want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The older SH-50 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-30 sensor size comparison

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus SH-50
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-30
43
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
35
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus SH-50 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-30 as a Street photography camera
64
image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch focus
lighter than average (269 grams)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
61
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proof
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus SH-50 Sports photography features
Ricoh WG-30 Sports photography features
48
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
45
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proof
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus SH-50 Travel photography details
Ricoh WG-30 Travel photography details
69
lighter than average (269g)
provides touch focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
very long reach (600mm)
missing Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
71
environment proof
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
does not have a selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SH-50 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh WG-30 Landscape photography highlights
49
you can focus manually
rather wide (25mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse recording
43
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count good (16MP)
environment proof
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus SH-50
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-30
34
rather wide (25mm)
touch screen
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (269 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing microphone support
33
relatively wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
provides face detection focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly display
missing external microphone support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh WG-30
 Olympus SH-50Ricoh WG-30
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus SH-50 Ricoh WG-30
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Launched 2013-01-08 2014-10-09
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VI -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 125 125
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-600mm (24.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-6.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 12.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m 3.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 269 grams (0.59 lbs) 192 grams (0.42 lbs)
Dimensions 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model SLB-10A D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $300 $428