Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-50
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh WG-50, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the SH-50 (16MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-50 was brought out 5 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the SH-50 scores against the WG-50 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-50 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Ricoh WG-50
| SH-50 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus SH-50
| WG-50 | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 | January 2013 | Newer by 53 months |
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh WG-50
| SH-50 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-50 has got outside measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh WG-50 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the SH-50 against the WG-50.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SH-50 and WG-50 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The picture here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SH-50 and WG-50.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same MP therefore you should expect similar quality of files however you really should factor the production date of the products into consideration. The more aged SH-50 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Olympus SH-50 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SH-50 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-01-08 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 gr (0.59 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-10A | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $300 | $280 |