Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-M1
Portability
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Portability
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
Olympus SH-50
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2013
Ricoh WG-M1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the SH-50 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SH-50 was launched 20 months earlier than the WG-M1 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the SH-50 matches up versus the WG-M1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SH-50 & Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-50 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SH-50 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+345k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus SH-50
| WG-M1 | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 20 months |
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Ricoh WG-M1
| SH-50 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-50 offers outside dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the SH-50 and the WG-M1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-50 and WG-M1 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out specifications. The pic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-50 and WG-M1.
To sum up, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus SH-50 to provide extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged SH-50 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus SH-50 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus SH-50 Street photography advice
Ricoh WG-M1 Street photography advice
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features focus via touch
lighter than average (269g)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
weather proof
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
maximum ISO low (800)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus SH-50 Sports photography advice
Ricoh WG-M1 Sports photography advice
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
weather proof
better than average battery pack (350 per charge)
fixed focal length ((1×)mm)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Olympus SH-50 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-M1 as a Travel photography camera
lighter than average (269 grams)
features focus via touch
decent MP (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
missing Timelapse mode
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
better than average battery pack (350 shots)
weather proof
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus SH-50
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-M1
focusing manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
missing Timelapse mode
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
weather proof
better than average battery pack (350 shots)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length ((1×)mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (1.5 inch)
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (800)
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus SH-50
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-M1
reasonably wide (25mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average (269g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not have selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone jack
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
missing external mic port
Photography Glossary
Olympus SH-50 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus SH-50 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus SH-50 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 12.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269 grams (0.59 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | SLB-10A | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $300 | $2,000 |