Clicky

Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A200

Portability
88
Imaging
39
Features
48
Overall
42
Olympus SH-50 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
Portability
66
Imaging
49
Features
38
Overall
44

Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A200 Key Specs

Olympus SH-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
  • Released January 2013
Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Released July 2008
  • Renewed by Sony A230
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A200 Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A200, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the SH-50 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The SH-50 was released 4 years after the A200 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the SH-50 matches up versus the A200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Sony A200

 SH-50 A200 
ReleasedJanuary 2013July 2008Newer by 55 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus SH-50

 A200 SH-50 

Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Sony A200

 SH-50 A200 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus SH-50 enjoys physical measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).

See the Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the SH-50 compared to the A200.

Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A200 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SH-50 and A200 is 88 and 66 respectively.

Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-50 and A200.

Clearly, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The SH-50 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus SH-50 will show more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent SH-50 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison

Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SH-50 Portrait photography information
Sony A200 Portrait photography information
43
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
supports face detection focus
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
53
manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no liveview
megapixel count low (10MP)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus SH-50 Street photography information
Sony A200 Street photography information
64
built in image stabilization (Optical)
provides touch to focus
lighter than competition in class (269 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus SH-50 Sports photography highlights
Sony A200 Sports photography highlights
48
excellent zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
supports tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
49
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10MP)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus SH-50 Travel photography highlights
Sony A200 Travel photography highlights
69
lighter than competition in class (269g)
provides touch to focus
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
46
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SH-50 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A200 as a Landscape photography camera
49
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
53
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.7")
no liveview
megapixel count low (10MP)
lack of Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SH-50 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A200 as a Vlogging camera
34
quite wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (269 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic port
9
no video shooting
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SH-50 and Sony A200
 Olympus SH-50Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus SH-50 Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2013-01-08 2008-07-17
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VI -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 125 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 25-600mm (24.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.0-6.9 -
Macro focus range 5cm -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 12.0 frames per second 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.00 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 269 gr (0.59 lbs) 572 gr (1.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 63
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.3
DXO Low light score not tested 521
Other
Battery model SLB-10A -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $300 $100