Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A300
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
64 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released January 2008
- Refreshed by Sony A330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A300 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus SH-50 versus Sony A300, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the SH-50 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SH-50 was announced 5 years after the A300 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the SH-50 scores against the A300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SH-50 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-50 Gallery & Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Sony A300
| SH-50 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 | January 2008 | Newer by 61 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus SH-50
| A300 | SH-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Sony A300
| SH-50 | A300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-50 offers physical dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) while the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SH-50 versus Sony A300 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the SH-50 vs the A300.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-50 and A300 is 88 and 64 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions just by researching technical specs. The image here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-50 and A300.
As you have seen, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The SH-50 with its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus SH-50 will provide you with extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger SH-50 will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus SH-50 vs Sony A300 Specifications
| Olympus SH-50 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus SH-50 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2008-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 12.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 632g (1.39 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $300 | $0 |