Olympus SH-50 vs Sony T900
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus SH-50 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Introduced February 2009
Olympus SH-50 vs Sony T900 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Olympus SH-50 and Sony T900, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the SH-50 (16MP) and T900 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe SH-50 was announced 3 years after the T900 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the SH-50 scores versus the T900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus SH-50 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SH-50 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-50 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Sony T900
SH-50 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | February 2009 | Newer by 48 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus SH-50
T900 | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Clearer screen (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-50 and Sony T900
SH-50 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus SH-50 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-50 comes with external measurements of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SH-50 and Sony T900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the SH-50 and the T900.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-50 and T900 is 88 and 96 respectively.
Olympus SH-50 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by going over technical specs. The picture here may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-50 and T900.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus SH-50 to offer greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher SH-50 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus SH-50 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-50 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Olympus SH-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus SH-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-01-08 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 2 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 269g (0.59 pounds) | 143g (0.32 pounds) |
Dimensions | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | SLB-10A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $300 | $300 |