Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus 9000
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
92 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Introduced May 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju 9000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus 9000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both created by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is very close and they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SP-565UZ was revealed 3 months prior to the 9000 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the SP-565UZ scores vs the 9000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus Stylus 9000. The full galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus 9000
| SP-565UZ | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| 9000 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus 9000
| SP-565UZ | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2009 |  | May 2009 | Same generation |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ comes with outside dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus 9000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the SP-565UZ against the 9000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and 9000 is 72 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through specifications. The picture below should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and 9000.
To sum up, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus 9000 to result in more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Otherwise known as | - | mju 9000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 50 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) | 225 grams (0.50 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, Internal | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $400 | $300 |