Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
- New Model is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-860, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and TG-860 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was unveiled 7 years earlier than the TG-860 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the SP-565UZ scores versus the TG-860 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-860
SP-565UZ | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
TG-860 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2015 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 73 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-860
SP-565UZ | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys outside dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-860 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SP-565UZ versus the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2211/a2211c9521f7e69a115c18e519c3b364140e26e5" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and TG-860 is 72 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26ad3/26ad3665666d93a2cd1ba62e02c914b8601ceda0" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and TG-860.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-860 to offer more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3502/b3502afd6d8442e234196c5c5da7db8b49269f57" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/264db/264db26764c25c4b9623fd03b7adab439d0cb4ce" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) | 224 grams (0.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $400 | $279 |