Clicky

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870

Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32
Olympus SP-565UZ front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front
Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
46
Overall
43

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs

Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Announced January 2009
Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
  • Released January 2016
  • Superseded the Olympus TG-860
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Overview

The following is a in depth review of the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-870, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SP-565UZ was announced 8 years earlier than the TG-870 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SP-565UZ grades vs the TG-870 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-870

 SP-565UZ TG-870 
Manual focus More exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 TG-870 SP-565UZ 
ReleasedJanuary 2016January 2009Newer by 84 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution921k230kSharper display (+691k dot)

Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-870

 SP-565UZ TG-870 
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ has got physical measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has specifications of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).

Compare the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the SP-565UZ against the TG-870.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and TG-870 is 72 and 91 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specs. The picture underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-565UZ and TG-870.

All in all, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-870 to produce extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-870
39
focusing manually
saves RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
36
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Street photography with Olympus TG-870
56
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
65
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
weather proofing
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
heavier than competition in class (221 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Sports photography with Olympus TG-870
33
great zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
max frames per second very slow (1.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
51
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
great battery pack (300 CIPA)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-870 as a Travel photography camera
52
built-in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
long zoom (520mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
69
great battery pack (300 per charge)
weather proofing
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (21mm)
heavier than competition in class (221g)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-870 Landscape photography features
40
focusing manually
fairly wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse mode
50
decently wide (21mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
weather proofing
great battery pack (300 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Vlogging camera
Olympus TG-870 as a Vlogging camera
24
fairly wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
32
decently wide (21mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic socket
heavier than competition in class (221 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-870
 Olympus SP-565UZOlympus Stylus Tough TG-870
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus SP-565UZ Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-15 2016-01-06
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Max enhanced ISO - 12800
Minimum native ISO 64 125
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 143 -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-520mm (20.0x) 21-105mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-4.5 f/3.5-5.7
Macro focusing distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Features
Min shutter speed 1 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 1.0fps 7.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 6.40 m (ISO 200) 4.00 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 413g (0.91 pounds) 221g (0.49 pounds)
Dimensions 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 30 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light rating 68 not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID 4 x AA Li-50B
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage xD Picture Card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $400 $280