Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98cb4/98cb42e909dff8452621d79a82a9f24270e5e01f" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 front"
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Push to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2016
- Superseded the Olympus TG-860
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-870, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was announced 8 years earlier than the TG-870 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the SP-565UZ grades vs the TG-870 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-870
SP-565UZ | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
TG-870 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 84 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-870
SP-565UZ | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ has got physical measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has specifications of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-870 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the SP-565UZ against the TG-870.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87399/873992736a676261aba9fdb55b1e3a5a6281932a" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and TG-870 is 72 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f8ef/5f8efef6341ec57c92497b8302b53e71d5e2892f" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specs. The picture underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-565UZ and TG-870.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-870 to produce extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dd91/3dd917eaadff1ecfdc06394af78d2ecc4c1f85ec" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a87e/6a87eea85d6348915a2cf7e123b53163f037c222" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2016-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413g (0.91 pounds) | 221g (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $400 | $280 |