Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-10
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus XZ-10, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SP-565UZ was announced 5 years before the XZ-10 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief view of how the SP-565UZ grades vs the XZ-10 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus XZ-10
| SP-565UZ | XZ-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| XZ-10 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 49 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus XZ-10
| SP-565UZ | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-565UZ has outer dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has sizing of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus XZ-10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the SP-565UZ and the XZ-10.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and XZ-10 is 72 and 91 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing only by going over specifications. The visual underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and XZ-10.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus XZ-10 to offer you greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413 gr (0.91 lb) | 221 gr (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $400 | $428 |
