Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-310, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was introduced 24 months prior to the TG-310 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the SP-565UZ scores vs the TG-310 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-565UZ & Olympus TG-310. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-310
SP-565UZ | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
TG-310 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 24 months |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-310
SP-565UZ | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys outer dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the SP-565UZ against the TG-310.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c3a4/0c3a4d30922b963c34d3c0e2c9031ed41efa3191" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and TG-310 is 72 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecaee/ecaee2b83fbb3d37911692c509351ab876e06634" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specifications. The image here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and TG-310.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-310 to show greater detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ebec/5ebece625360cc6244fdde7a049524082e33eeae" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01b39/01b39c895d22d7b03b902085db389dbb88d1d0bd" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-310 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 4.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413g (0.91 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $400 | $0 |