Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-320
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-320, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and TG-320 (14MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SP-565UZ was released 4 years before the TG-320 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the SP-565UZ grades against the TG-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-320
| SP-565UZ | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| TG-320 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 36 months |
| Display size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-320
| SP-565UZ | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-565UZ comes with exterior dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the SP-565UZ compared to the TG-320.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and TG-320 is 72 and 94 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and TG-320.
Clearly, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to give extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413g (0.91 lbs) | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $400 | $0 |