Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ae1/01ae1246b008c2c1438d02f27195e5dcd053dfef" alt="Olympus TG-610 front Olympus TG-610 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are sold by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and TG-610 (14MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was released 24 months earlier than the TG-610 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the SP-565UZ matches up vs the TG-610 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-610. The complete galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-610
SP-565UZ | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
TG-610 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 24 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-610
SP-565UZ | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus TG-610 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the SP-565UZ versus the TG-610.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc83/1bc83499e88edeb9e33c0cfd1a00b4b948dff425" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and TG-610 is 72 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00cf8/00cf8dac5553c0ce38e852ff573a6a2393f35041" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through specifications. The picture underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and TG-610.
Plainly, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should expect the Olympus TG-610 to provide greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6db2/e6db250badbcee998b50caeb84d0cc302859358b" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b72b/9b72ba365548773c7b062057dff8ba76db549541" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-610 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-610 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 143 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 210 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $400 | $223 |