Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe SP-565UZ was brought out 4 years before the TG-820 iHS and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the SP-565UZ scores vs the TG-820 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SP-565UZ | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| TG-820 iHS | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 37 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| SP-565UZ | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys exterior dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has sizing of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the SP-565UZ versus the TG-820 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and TG-820 iHS is 72 and 92 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through specs. The graphic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and TG-820 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-820 iHS to provide more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,030k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413g (0.91 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $400 | $500 |