Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-3
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-4
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-3, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and TG-3 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SP-565UZ was brought out 6 years before the TG-3 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the SP-565UZ grades vs the TG-3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-565UZ & Olympus Tough TG-3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-3
| SP-565UZ | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| TG-3 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 63 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-3
| SP-565UZ | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ comes with physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-565UZ vs the TG-3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and TG-3 is 72 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over specifications. The visual underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and TG-3.
Plainly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus TG-3 to deliver extra detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-15 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 143 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $400 | $350 |