Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-6
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
90 Imaging
39 Features
54 Overall
45
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 253g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2019
- Old Model is Olympus TG-5
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-6, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the TG-6 (12MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe SP-565UZ was announced 11 years before the TG-6 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the SP-565UZ scores against the TG-6 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus Tough TG-6. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Olympus TG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus TG-6
| SP-565UZ | TG-6 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-6 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| TG-6 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2019 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 125 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus TG-6
| SP-565UZ | TG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus SP-565UZ offers exterior dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-6 has measurements of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 253 grams (0.56 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Olympus TG-6 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the SP-565UZ and the TG-6.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and TG-6 is 72 and 90 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specifications. The pic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and TG-6.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-6 to deliver more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus TG-6 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Tough TG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus Tough TG-6 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2019-05-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 20.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Slow sync. (1st curtain), Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Fill- in, Manual, Flash Off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PC |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413g (0.91 pounds) | 253g (0.56 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I support) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $400 | $449 |