Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VG-110
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2011
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus VG-110, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are built by Olympus. The resolution of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and the VG-110 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe SP-565UZ was manufactured 3 years earlier than the VG-110 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the SP-565UZ scores versus the VG-110 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ & Olympus VG-110. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus VG-110
SP-565UZ | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
VG-110 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | January 2009 | More modern by 25 months | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus VG-110
SP-565UZ | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ comes with outside dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus VG-110 has proportions of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus VG-110 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the SP-565UZ vs the VG-110.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the SP-565UZ and VG-110 is 72 and 97 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The image here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and VG-110.
Clearly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus VG-110 to provide greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus VG-110 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-01-15 | 2011-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) | 105 grams (0.23 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 170 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $400 | $150 |