Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000
77 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0caf0/0caf02c15539c36b2fb3f81379859b5c5d17f544" alt="Olympus E-420 front Olympus E-420 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cd55/6cd55e755b246a73ebaa42d5216b8beb3a328143" alt="Olympus Stylus 9000 front Olympus Stylus 9000 front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-420 (10MP) and the 9000 (12MP) is fairly similar but the E-420 (Four Thirds) and 9000 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-420 was revealed 10 months before the 9000 so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-420 grades against the 9000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-420 & Olympus Stylus 9000. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-420 Gallery & Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Olympus 9000
E-420 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Olympus E-420
9000 | E-420 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2009 | ![]() | June 2008 | More recent by 10 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-420 and Olympus 9000
E-420 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equivalent display sizing |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-420 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Olympus 9000 has dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-420 compared to the 9000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2cb43/2cb4312712b835b946b14583e126d00650b27e94" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-420 and 9000 is 77 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be178/be178686626b009ce714da5d67213103fead15f2" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-420 and 9000.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-420 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus 9000 will deliver more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The older E-420 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bc36/6bc36b828b715114bd59a28358ca5681082772a1" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10875/108755519103aca7223eebb8a938a2aad53d309b" alt="Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-420 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
Olympus E-420 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-420 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
Also Known as | - | mju 9000 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2008-06-23 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 225 grams (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 527 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $999 | $300 |