Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f27/59f2779b461c5c1f48d75ee4336ab725697c7831" alt="Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front"
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Here is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus VH-410, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and VH-410 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The SP-565UZ was announced 4 years prior to the VH-410 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the SP-565UZ matches up against the VH-410 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus SP-565UZ & Olympus VH-410. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus VH-410
SP-565UZ | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
VH-410 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 43 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus VH-410
SP-565UZ | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ has outside measurements of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-410 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Olympus SP-565UZ and Olympus VH-410 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the SP-565UZ against the VH-410.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ccae/5ccaeed0048d4ffdda5e3ace7eade7ac47ea4679" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the SP-565UZ and VH-410 is 72 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c256/6c25687257ac24ed39d146c09e3fdf345aa9d898" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the SP-565UZ and VH-410.
As you can see, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus VH-410 to give more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older SP-565UZ is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60823/6082379073424de7dea039fa0e165818340ece10" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison"
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0c9f/e0c9f67566afb684e51f09e257d268025f34bafc" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus SP-565UZ | Olympus VH-410 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 143 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 413 grams (0.91 lbs) | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $400 | $186 |